231,245
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200525010944/@comment-45314928-20200525202503 (edit)
Revision as of 23:42, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) Tag: Disambiguation links |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
i had no idea that there had already been a thread, but i think that is ridiculous. we shouldnt need "new evidence" to protest against something that is very clearly broken. and actually, this thread was originally opened as an outcry for all of the currently missing companions from any section of any template; | i had no idea that there had already been a thread, but i think that is ridiculous. we shouldnt need "new evidence" to protest against something that is very clearly broken. and actually, this thread was originally opened as an outcry for all of the currently missing companions from any section of any template; | ||
| Line 22: | Line 21: | ||
this is why i asked in the OP for someone, with admin rights, to go through all of the companion template and add the missing companions in somewhere. however, i realised that this would be difficult without a definition - hence the rest of the discussion. | this is why i asked in the OP for someone, with admin rights, to go through all of the companion template and add the missing companions in somewhere. however, i realised that this would be difficult without a definition - hence the rest of the discussion. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200525010944-45314928/20200525202503-45314928]]</noinclude> | ||