Trusted
8,512
edits
→Edit war
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
[[User:Danniesen]] please re-familiarize yourself with [[Tardis:No personal attacks]]. Your behavior to a new editor here is giving a very false impression about how we want to treat new editors. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:18, 29 May 2023 (UTC) | [[User:Danniesen]] please re-familiarize yourself with [[Tardis:No personal attacks]]. Your behavior to a new editor here is giving a very false impression about how we want to treat new editors. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:18, 29 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
:Not everything is a personal attack. You can have an argument with someone and even say their stance is incorrect without it being a personal attack. New user or not. I’m sorry, but does it not raise any alarms with you that a user does not interact with the wiki other than to undo one specific edit over and over, even when explanations are given (by two different users even)? [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC) | :Not everything is a personal attack. You can have an argument with someone and even say their stance is incorrect without it being a personal attack. New user or not. I’m sorry, but does it not raise any alarms with you that a user does not interact with the wiki other than to undo one specific edit over and over, even when explanations are given (by two different users even)? [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
::"It's an assumption based on filming blocks from four years ago; do you have a source that this series' production blocks (bar block 2) are all two episodes?" | |||
::No it's not. This is why I asked whether you actually read the sources. They ''explicitly'' say which episodes are parts of which blocks, and all but block 5 are accounted for. Whether or not these sources end up being wrong is irrelevant, things change, it's something we have to deal with in editing pages like this. But at the present time this is the best information we have, and it ''logically entails'' the conclusion Danniesen has placed on the page. Nobody is assuming things. And quite frankly this seems to me to be an archetypal [[T:POINT]] violation. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:51, 29 May 2023 (UTC) | |||