emailconfirmed, Administrators
15,041
edits
Forum:Relaxing our fan works policy (within reason) (edit)
Revision as of 18:52, 1 June 2023
, 1 June 2023no edit summary
No edit summary Tag: visualeditor-wikitext |
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
:: I grant that it's only a stub — but still, I can't help but feel that such things are just a patchy solution. What would you do with something like ''Exchange'', or — in fact — with a purely standalone fanfilm like ''Time Rift''? [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 16:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC) | :: I grant that it's only a stub — but still, I can't help but feel that such things are just a patchy solution. What would you do with something like ''Exchange'', or — in fact — with a purely standalone fanfilm like ''Time Rift''? [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 16:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: ''Time Rift'' would go on [[Fan film]] or [[Fan films]], following the long-established [[Charity publication]] precedent. I don't know of any fan works called ''Exchange'', but if you mean the Magrs novel, I've long thought it would be very useful to have a "Other works with ties to ''Doctor Who''" section on author pages, for instance to discuss [[Russell T Davies]]' "single universe" approach to his shows in a single place. That idea may seem new or weird, but I still think it's leaps and bounds clearer than the alternative, i.e. opening the door to users creating pages for individual non-covered releases. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 18:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC) | |||