Trusted
49,539
edits
More actions
Forum:A Fix with Sontarans: Fixing Fix's Validity (edit)
Revision as of 19:59, 16 July 2023
, 16 July 2023→Discussion
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
(As for FaH potentially being invalid, that's a '''''completely''''' different line of argument and far outside the bounds of this thread. Suffice it to say that it's not because of properties of FaH and AFwS in particular. I plan on a truly massive thread going over this, so just stay tuned.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC) | (As for FaH potentially being invalid, that's a '''''completely''''' different line of argument and far outside the bounds of this thread. Suffice it to say that it's not because of properties of FaH and AFwS in particular. I plan on a truly massive thread going over this, so just stay tuned.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Retconning parts of a story so it fits into continuity... I mean, that is literally a form of continuity as {{w|Retroactive continuity|"retcon" is just short for "retroactive continuity"}}. Ignoring a previously established part of a story is just one of many forms of a retcon, but it still involves continuity; we can't pick and choose what sort of continuity is continuity enough to say something is in continuity! {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 19:59, 16 July 2023 (UTC) | |||