Trusted
34,029
edits
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
::::I fundamentally disagree with OS25's view of past arguments, and the thread I'm envisioning will be ''much'' more in depth, as it will touch on every area that I think R4bp corrodes the rest of our rules, but that will be part of it. I don't think it's necessary for discussion in this thread, as in this thread [[T:BOUND]] applies and R4bp is the law of the land. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:17, 16 July 2023 (UTC) | ::::I fundamentally disagree with OS25's view of past arguments, and the thread I'm envisioning will be ''much'' more in depth, as it will touch on every area that I think R4bp corrodes the rest of our rules, but that will be part of it. I don't think it's necessary for discussion in this thread, as in this thread [[T:BOUND]] applies and R4bp is the law of the land. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:17, 16 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::::As someone who has read ''Fixing a Hole'' and started the original debate about it, from my memory the short story does not, in fact, "ignore the ending," it just doesn't mention the ending. There's a difference. | |||
:::::You're allowed to disagree with me about the present having more weight than the past, but I just think precedent is on my side. Context is important but context does not overrule community. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 20:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC) |