Trusted
8,500
edits
More actions
→Discussion
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
This is why further media featuring concepts debuting in spinoff stories should not be covered automatically. Now, if the same episode had featured a concept more closely associated with the Doctor, for example a rat companion, that ''might'' be a different story. But as it is, the concepts introduced are, outside of the one episode, irrelevant to Doctor Who. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC) | This is why further media featuring concepts debuting in spinoff stories should not be covered automatically. Now, if the same episode had featured a concept more closely associated with the Doctor, for example a rat companion, that ''might'' be a different story. But as it is, the concepts introduced are, outside of the one episode, irrelevant to Doctor Who. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: but I would presume the idea of daisy-chaining is relevant yet distinct from that thread | |||
:So, insofar as it applies to ''crossovers in particular'' this is the case, yes, it's a subset of a more general discussion being had. But ever since Scrooge's first Object Level Reply we've been discussing, to greater or lesser extent, his proposed path forward for reforming [[T:VS]], which places front and center the daisy-chaining of DWU concepts / narrative connections. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
{{Notelist}} | {{Notelist}} | ||