Trusted
6,387
edits
More actions
Forum:Coverage/validity: In the Domain of the Daleks (edit)
Revision as of 20:20, 17 September 2023
, 17 September 2023no edit summary
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Inclusion debates}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> thumb|This write up on the back of the playset's packaging clearly shows that it is trying to tell a specific story. I've got something a little unusual that I think might be eligible for coverage by this wiki. A playset produced by Bluebird Toys in 1997 called In the ''Domain of the Daleks''....") Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[File:In the Domain of the Daleks story.jpg|thumb|This write up on the back of the playset's packaging clearly shows that it is trying to tell a specific story.]] | [[File:In the Domain of the Daleks story.jpg|thumb|This write up on the back of the playset's packaging clearly shows that it is trying to tell a specific story.]] | ||
I've got something a little unusual that I think might be eligible for coverage by this wiki. A playset produced by Bluebird Toys in 1997 called In the ''Domain of the Daleks''. The playset appears to be trying to tell a specific story, so I think it should be a source on this wiki. The problem is, I'm not exactly sure if it qualifies as a work of fiction. This might be a case of something passing the old version of Rule 1, but not the current version of it. If this is the case, I think coverage as invalid might be an option, as this wiki covers several things that aren't quite works of fiction as invalid. [[User:Cgl1999|Cgl1999]] [[User talk:Cgl1999|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC) | I've got something a little unusual that I think might be eligible for coverage by this wiki. A playset produced by Bluebird Toys in 1997 called In the ''Domain of the Daleks''. The playset appears to be trying to tell a specific story, so I think it should be a source on this wiki. The problem is, I'm not exactly sure if it qualifies as a work of fiction. This might be a case of something passing the old version of Rule 1, but not the current version of it. If this is the case, I think coverage as invalid might be an option, as this wiki covers several things that aren't quite works of fiction as invalid. [[User:Cgl1999|Cgl1999]] [[User talk:Cgl1999|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
==Discussion== | |||
Yeah, I think this'd definitely qualify for valid coverage. I'm not quite sure how it where you'd cover it, though. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">📢</span>]] 20:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC) | |||