emailconfirmed, Administrators
129,644
edits
More actions
Forum:10 Years on, Amnesty Once More (view source)
Revision as of 01:13, 24 October 2023
, 24 October 2023→Discussion
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
:::I think the suspicion is [[User:RadMatter]] as well, for more context in making this decision. Personally, I'd be inclined to give 'em one more chance on the sockpuppet issue. And I do mean one more. But that's me. I've defended DiS more than most on here reasonably would, for some bizarre reason. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC) | :::I think the suspicion is [[User:RadMatter]] as well, for more context in making this decision. Personally, I'd be inclined to give 'em one more chance on the sockpuppet issue. And I do mean one more. But that's me. I've defended DiS more than most on here reasonably would, for some bizarre reason. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
I've never been a fan of these amnesties. A block amnesty would unlock everyone, including several outright trolls/vandals. It's better to individually assess each user instead of freeing everyone, including the guy who used to regularly attack [[User:Doug86]] or the guy who lied about being the wiki's founder so he could access admin rights. | |||
And the problem with sock puppetry is users trying to get around blocks. It makes the block useless if someone is allowed to continue editing, though under another name. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC) | |||