Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,216
edits
More actions
no edit summary
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:You can get a lot more input at [[Forum:Clarifying in-universe deadnaming policy in response to Rose Noble]]. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC) | :You can get a lot more input at [[Forum:Clarifying in-universe deadnaming policy in response to Rose Noble]]. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: The text tells us that Rose is "non-binary", unambiguously. It focuses on an image of Rose while literally saying the word "non-binary" out loud. Even if that was RTD getting his terminology muddled up, well, [[T:NO RW]] applies, as do our rules against taking authorial intent as valid in itself: the valid source itself tells us Rose is "non-binary", we can't argue with that because we think possibly Davies said it by accident. (But then I don't think he did; later she cheerfully gets the "…and neither, and more" part of the punchline. I think it ''is'' pretty clearly the case that she's female-presenting non-binary.) [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 12:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC) | |||