Trusted
8,512
edits
Forum:TV Comic & other periodical issues (edit)
Revision as of 19:56, 5 September 2024
, 5 September→Discussion
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
::::: Either way, the most important thing here is that we only seem to get invested in things like ''laws'' and specifically ''American legal defenses'' when it comes to new things we're changing on the site. Showing TV Comic covers is equally as legally justified as showing DWM covers - we could very easily get sued by Panini if they wanted it, but it's not going to happen. In the end, that's the most important talking point. ''It's not going to happen.'' [[User:OttselSpy25|OttselSpy25]] [[User talk:OttselSpy25|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | ::::: Either way, the most important thing here is that we only seem to get invested in things like ''laws'' and specifically ''American legal defenses'' when it comes to new things we're changing on the site. Showing TV Comic covers is equally as legally justified as showing DWM covers - we could very easily get sued by Panini if they wanted it, but it's not going to happen. In the end, that's the most important talking point. ''It's not going to happen.'' [[User:OttselSpy25|OttselSpy25]] [[User talk:OttselSpy25|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | ||
I'm unconvinced that the ''whole of the first page'' would be showed in the hypothetical new market. Nor do I think it's analogous to DWM covers, as those aren't ''comic panels''. (I also think ''Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. RDR Books'' is substantially nicer to much of what we do here than you're suggesting, but, yes, we probably tread a little close to the line at times - most specifically wrt our coverage of IU non narrative stuff.) Regardless, I think we won't see eye to eye on this. Oh well! [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | |||