Trusted
8,483
edits
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
::: No no? Across the Internet and by mere merit of a shared universe with ''TMS'', CM is a Muppet; as we have a source directly addressing his species without naming it, that would be grounds to have a conjecture'd page. We've precedent for this and it isn't a T:NO RW breach. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 21:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | ::: No no? Across the Internet and by mere merit of a shared universe with ''TMS'', CM is a Muppet; as we have a source directly addressing his species without naming it, that would be grounds to have a conjecture'd page. We've precedent for this and it isn't a T:NO RW breach. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 21:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::This is ''obviously'' mistaken. Suppose we had pages for individual dates in month+day+year format. And suppose some story brought up the topic of <s>Marco Polo</s> Albert Einstein's birthday, while mentioning the possibility of it being <s>a specific date in 1252</s> March 14, 1875. It would be improper to create a page for both that date, as well as for "March 14, 1879" on the basis that it's Albert Einstein's birthday under a conjecture tag, ''when no such date was mentioned''. If you want to create a "Cookie Monster's Species" page, that's fine. But to conjecturally call it "Muppet" is improper ''when the very source cited disputes this idea''. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC) |