Trusted
57,397
edits
Forum:Covering spin-offs of parodies (edit)
Revision as of 20:33, 23 December 2024
, Monday at 20:33→Discussion
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
In ''principle'' I would definitely agree that spin-offs of invalid-but-coveed sources are straightforwardly coverable. I would say the status of ''Sleigh What?'' itself is arguable for reasons completely unrelated to that question i.e. the fact that the series-wide licensed link of the made-up credited crewmembers only exists at the meta level and does not involve any of the in-universe elements of either series. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | In ''principle'' I would definitely agree that spin-offs of invalid-but-coveed sources are straightforwardly coverable. I would say the status of ''Sleigh What?'' itself is arguable for reasons completely unrelated to that question i.e. the fact that the series-wide licensed link of the made-up credited crewmembers only exists at the meta level and does not involve any of the in-universe elements of either series. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
: Well, the idea was that the credits would themselves be covered as part of the source, although I'm not certain on the specifics of what those pages would say. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||