no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
:::::You really don't read my posts do you? The very first post in this forum. ''"My theory was that, unless Rory was absent from series 6 when River appears, River had the series 6 adventures before she returned to the wedding, which would explain why can know of Rory in series 6."'' '''That's''' the basic theory. --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 20:06, August 8, 2010 (UTC) | :::::You really don't read my posts do you? The very first post in this forum. ''"My theory was that, unless Rory was absent from series 6 when River appears, River had the series 6 adventures before she returned to the wedding, which would explain why can know of Rory in series 6."'' '''That's''' the basic theory. --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 20:06, August 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::: | |||
:::::And almost EVERYONE in this thread and the other one told you...IT DOESN'T WORK! You can't throw in a scenario that cannot logically happen unless you can back it. The whole thing is getting babaric, you acknowledge the forked timeline doesn't work, and everyone told you the whole model is just plain irrational, then now you're saying you can reject the theory and the conclusion could still hold true? That would not be a basic theory...that would be just making a senseless statement despite that all its supports have been refuted. If you have no theory and you are just making a logically impossible claim, you should probably not post it in the forum asking people to "understand" it...--[[Special:Contributions/222.166.181.46|222.166.181.46]] 06:33, August 9, 2010 (UTC) | |||