Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
→Tech notes
(removing inuse because the reason it was flagged has been resolved) |
|||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
==Tech notes== | ==Tech notes== | ||
*If you ban a person with moderator rights, that banning does not apply until they next attempt to log in. In other words, here is no way to "kick" a moderator. Also, if you withdraw moderator status, it doesn't happen immediately. That user loses their status only by leaving the chat of their own choice. | *If you ban a person with moderator rights, that banning does not apply until they next attempt to log in. In other words, here is no way to "kick" a moderator. Also, if you withdraw moderator status, it doesn't happen immediately. That user loses their status only by leaving the chat of their own choice. | ||
*Bureaucrats have no ability to affect an admin's chat moderator status. When a bureaucrat looks at an admin's permissions at [[Special: | *Bureaucrats have no ability to affect an admin's chat moderator status. When a bureaucrat looks at an admin's permissions at [[Special:UserRights]], it ''appears'' that admins need to have their chatmoderator box ticked. However, it doesn't matter whether this box is ticked or not: admins are, by immutable default, chatmods. | ||
*You can keep up with developments of the chat extension at [[community:chat]]. | *You can keep up with developments of the chat extension at [[community:chat]]. | ||
[[category:policies]] | [[category:policies]] | ||