Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators
12,466
edits
m
Bongolium500 moved page Talk:Ian Chesterton - list of appearances to Talk:Ian Chesterton/Appearances: moving appearance page
(What does that mean?) |
Bongolium500 (talk | contribs) m (Bongolium500 moved page Talk:Ian Chesterton - list of appearances to Talk:Ian Chesterton/Appearances: moving appearance page) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
"Comprehensive but not definitive" What is the useful distinction? [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 00:45, August 6, 2011 (UTC) | "Comprehensive but not definitive" What is the useful distinction? [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 00:45, August 6, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:What indeed. These lists of appearance pages piss me off so I don't spend much time here, precisely for this reason. They should be done automatically, through the use of categories, rather than being a managed list. The message shouldn't appear at all, as ''nothing'' on a wiki is ever truly "definitive" anyway. No need for ''only'' these appearance lists to bear such a message — especially since, as you rightly point out, there's no useful distinction between ''comprehensive'' and ''definitive''. I think the person who wrote that was probably meaning to say, "comprehensive but not complete". But, as I said, ''no'' message like this should adorn these appearance list pages. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''01:16:23 Sat '''06 Aug 2011 </span> | |||
Thanks, Czechout. I'll remove it.[[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 01:20, August 6, 2011 (UTC) | |||
::It was one of those notes that was on many list of pages early on in this wiki's life, one of many things that was never removed. | |||
::I think it was just to say 'we're still building this page, don't complain if story X isn't here'. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:08, August 6, 2011 (UTC) | |||