Harry's Final Fate[[edit source]]
There are conflicting accounts of Harry's later fate. In the below biography, it is established both that Sarah Jane met with Harry during 2010, and also that he died before 2009! At least one of these (if not both) is false; the novellisation of the Wedding of Sarah Jane Smith differs slightly from the actual episode so could be discarded as not true, but the 2010-meetings source has no mention of her world-saving adventures as portrayed in The Sarah Jane Adventures. Therefore I am re-labelling these parts under "possible fates" 82.42.249.145 20:58, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
There is no contradiction. The SJS audio in question takes place in 2006, and in it Sarah Jane already says that Harry is missing in action, and while they used to meet in that place every year, by then she has been coming there for some time alone in hope of seeing her again. And according to the article about it, the "Wedding..." novelisation also mentions her believing him to be dead or missing in action too, not certain that he's dead. Therefore him being alive by 2015 according to the Virgin novel is also not a contradiction. 78.9.7.155talk to me 20:06, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
Cricket[[edit source]]
For any Americans in the audience, you know a metre is just over 3 feet, right? So throwing a cricket ball that far isn't really an achievment. Doesn't mean Harry wasn't good at cricket, but it's not really proof. Or is that a joke that sailed right over me?
188.29.165.176talk to me 19:29, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
- Not sure what your point is, but the information is properly cited as coming from a valid source. Doesn't matter if the editor was American or not. Shambala108 ☎ 02:47, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
Did they mean Meter per Second? Again, that's not very impressive, but it would make more sense than throwing it over a very small distance. He should be able to throw it over a dozen meters, if he's of average strength.
New infobox image[[edit source]]
Personally, I'm not a fan of the current infobox image for Harry and suggest the following as replacements. Jack ☎ 13:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Current
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
- Number 5 is high quality and my vote probably goes to that one. Poor Harry doesn't get many closeups. Jack ☎ 13:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dapper he may be but I don't think it represents his most common look. I think my vote goes to one of 7 or 11. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 13:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)