Talk:Intru-da-window

Why is the at page even the candidate for deletion? – The preceding unsigned comment was added by SJM-123 (talk • contribs) .

Reason

Why is the page a candidate for deletion if it is a canon joke said by multiple doctor who characters? – The preceding unsigned comment was added by SJM-123 (talk • contribs) .

Like the deletion template on the page says, I don't believe that punchlines to jokes deserve their own page. Jack "BtR" Saxon ☎ 20:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Seems to be an obvious deletion candidate. We wikify nouns. This isn't a noun. Najawin ☎ 21:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Intruder window or Intruda window would be a noun though. – n8 (☎) 20:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

It would be, but there's no such thing as an "intruder window". It's just wordplay. Jack "BtR" Saxon ☎ 20:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Considering we have pages on on other jokes such as Knock-knock joke, I'm not sure why there is any reason to delete this page.

EPSILON^🔎 |📯|📂|📦|📝

20:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

I can’t believe it was up for debate whether “intru-da-window” was a thing. Danniesen ☎ 20:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

A knock-knock joke is a kind of joke, though, not a specific joke. I don't think it makes sense to start making pages for individual jokes and naming them after their punchline. Jack "BtR" Saxon ☎ 20:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Yeah. A knock-knock joke is a kind of joke as Jack said. “Intru-da-window” isn’t a joke, it’s the punchline of a joke. Literally a play on a word. Danniesen ☎ 20:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)