Tardis talk:What Tardis Wiki is not

Typos

There is at least one typo in this article, but I can't fix it because it is locked. Tardis1963 talk 23:13, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

I've gone through the article and hopefully picked up all the spelling errors. Thanks. --Tangerineduel / talk 14:00, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Sex in DWU?

"People have sex in the DWU, which has been filmed somewhat graphically on occasion"

Huh? You must be talking about Torchwood, I don't recall any sex on Doctor Who. Captain Jack was nude but you could only see his torso. 64.134.71.199^{talk to me} 21:52, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

Torchwood is part of the DWU, and there is lots of sex in Doctor Who, we just don't get to see any of it. --MrThermomanPreacher ☎ 22:41, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

And, in addition to filmed sex, there is of course described sex, which occurs with some regularity in the books, particularly those in the NA range.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍  15:10: Fri 31 Jan 2014

No longer bound by Fandom.

Seeing as there's been a wiki move, someone should really get rid of that bit where we talk about the FANDOM terms and conditions. Actually, I know there are other places where we do that, maybe check them too. Also, I am unable to know how many pages were ported over and I like looking at how much the numbers move between wiki visits. Also, why are there no tags on the pages any more? Sorry, went a bit off topic there.

We should also decide on whether we're gonna allow NSFW images now that we're off FANDOM. (Please say no, please say no.) Najawin ☎ 21:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

On this note - we no longer have to worry about the Discussions page and can probably remove the section on it - CodeAndGin | 🗨 | 17:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Re: Discussions: well-spotted!

As regards NSFW content, etc. — the plan, as discussed with the people maintaining the new host, is to eventually introduce a more robust, built-in content-warning system, including such features as "spoiler text" or blurring images until tapped. For now we're sticking with the status quo (in both permissive and restrictive directions), but once that update is rolled out, the entire matter of how to handle potentially offensive/triggering/etc. content, including in images, will be rediscussed and reimagined. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 18:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)