Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-26845762-20161224213001

OncomingStorm12th wrote: Can we get a quote on that?

From the article "No one can hear you SCREAM" in DWM 336:

"The Ninth Doctor in a story that sets its sights on the future and provides a starting point for ongoing adventures without reformatting the show. Traditional but original, new monsters that behave like Doctor Who monsters should, and a new Doctor with a new way of doing things who's still very much the Doctor we know and love" - Paul Cornell

Maybe even broadcast on television - just like like how proper Doctor Who used to be. Actually, according to BBCi, this is proper Doctor Who.

"It's a new medium, a new start for Doctor Who. No one knows what the next step is going to be." - James Goss

Also in DWM 336:

After Eight

He came back to life before your eyes. But now he's regenerated - and no one thought to tell him. Benjamin Cook caught up with Paul Mcgann to mourn the passing of the Eight Doctor and pass judgement on his usurper [Richard E Grant].

In an interview with Justin Richards in DWM 338:

"My thought was that it would be nice to do 'Ninth Doctor' books within the Past Doctors line - there really isn't enough in Shalka to kick off a whole new strand, although it might have been possible if we'd been able to do one extra book every quarter in its own sub-range" - Justin Richards

The intent during production was most definitely that the story was set within the DWU. If only for a month, Richard E Grant was undeniably The Ninth Doctor. If COMIC: Genesis of Evil remains a valid source after Genesis of the Daleks, why can't Shalka remain a valid source after Rose. We can't go around saying "all media have equal weight" if we only cover the popular stuff.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.