Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Forum:References to BFDWU as alternate or diverging timeline

The Cloisters
Revision as of 21:59, 11 July 2012 by Josiah Rowe (talk | contribs) (reply)
IndexPanopticon → References to BFDWU as alternate or diverging timeline
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

As Doctor Who Unbound content has the {{notdwu}} header and set outside the DWU, is it good form to refer to these what-ifs as alternative versions or alternative timelines as in-universe wording? Should these versions be mentioned at all on "main" pages of the subject? -- Tybort (talk page) 12:29, July 11, 2012 (UTC)

Could you give an example of the sort of page where this is happening? —Josiah Rowe talk to me 19:39, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Okay, Ross Brimmicombe-Wood. -- Tybort (talk page) 20:12, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. Well, I think we have three options: one, we find some official source (e.g. Big Finish promotional material, DWM, a quotation from the writer) which describes either this Unbound or all the Unbounds as an alternative timeline — in which case we might want to reconsider the {{notdwu}} template, as it might be considered equivalent to the timeline seen in Turn Left; two, we move the "alternate" material to a "behind the scenes" section and reword accordingly ("Brimmicombe-Wood first appeared in the Doctor Who Unbound story Sympathy for the Devil, in which he was portrayed as the leader of UNIT..."); or three, we create a separate page for the Unbound version of the character (presumably called Ross Brimmicombe-Wood (Sympathy for the Devil)?) and explain the history in a behind-the-scenes section in both articles. My preference would be for the second option, as it would avoid unnecessary duplication, but I suppose that the third option would be most in keeping with the strictest interpretation of policy. —Josiah Rowe talk to me 21:25, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Hmm, actually, I'm leaning towards 2 AND 3. Include a behind the scenes reference, but with a link to Ross Brimmicombe-Wood (Sympathy for the Devil). The wording on Big Finish's site calls them "what-ifs", which sounds like it belongs completely outside the DWU, but I'd like to hear more from people who actually know more than I do about Big Finish before jumping to that conclusion.
For comparison, here are more references to "alternate timelines" to possibly put my point across better: Thalek, Mao Tse-Tung and Silurian. -- Tybort (talk page) 21:40, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Hmmm. Perhaps we should deal with this on a case-by-case basis. See, I can understand the rationale for creating Ross Brimmicombe-Wood (Sympathy for the Devil), but Mao Tse-Tung (Sympathy for the Devil) seems like overkill, considering that he didn't even appear in that story — the Doctor just mentions him. I think that could go into a BTS note. Silurian is trickier, since there are already several "official" alternate timelines featuring them. Not sure about that one. —Josiah Rowe talk to me 21:59, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.