Forum:Do we need a separate Adventure Games infobox?

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Revision as of 03:30, 28 August 2012 by CzechBot (talk | contribs) (Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
ForumsArchive indexPanopticon archives → Do we need a separate Adventure Games infobox?
This thread has been archived.
Please create a new thread on the new forums if you want to talk about this topic some more.
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.

The article for City of the Daleks uses the existing NewTV infobox. Someone tried to modify the fields to give "game number" instead of "story number", "date" instead of "broadcast date", and... I think something else that I forgot. Of course that didn't work. I fixed it up, but it looks a little weird talking about the "broadcast date" for a game.

Also, I think it would be useful to have both "Game number 1" and "Story number 14" show up in the infobox, and both "Series 5" and "The Adventure Games". If you look at the page, you can see that I managed to cram everything in, but it doesn't look great this way.

I can think of two good solutions:

  • Add new fields to the NewTV infobox.
  • Clone NewTV as AdventureGame and modify the fields.

Any input? --Falcotron 13:02, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Just simply modify the already Infobox Video Game template --Vitas 23:13, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Archivist's notes[[edit source]]

The answer to the question, as Vistas pointed out, was "no".
czechout<staff />   01:55: Wed 02 Nov 2011