Talk:The Fires of Pompeii (TV story)
References
I'm new to this, but there's a couple of references that you may want to list. Firstly, The Doctor and Donna instroduce themselves both as Spartacus, a reference to the 1960 film of the same name. Also, when Donna is asking what an auger is(Around 13 mins in), The Doctor explains that she's from Barcelona, a reference to the TV show Fawlty Towers, where the main character explained away the oddness of his waiter manuel, by saying 'Oh don't mind him, he's from Barcelona'. Finally, the two scenes around 5:30 and 9:30 in with the family preparing for the volcano are remarkably similar to a scene in the 1964 film Mary Poppins. [[1]] Is a clip of the scene, around 1 minute in. 86.20.208.2 02:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's a reference as far as the 'real world' goes (your references are almost word for word for the BBC Fact file which is within the external links page on the BBC site), but the references section is for references to the 'Doctor Who Universe' (stuff like the stuff that's listed in there). If you believe it's a valid point please put it under the story notes, or in a subsection within for 'Cultural notes' or something like that. --Tangerineduel 13:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Discontinuity, Plot holes, Errors
"If the eruption of Pompeii gave psychic vision of an alternate timeline in which the Pyroviles succeeded and there was no eruption "without the Doctors intervention" then how did Lucius Dextrus see Donna from London, she should not appear in his timeline and be a Pyrovile."
In this scene, they are not seeing the future, they are reading the Doctor/Donna's minds, so even if London didn't exist, Donna knew she was from London, and he read that.
The idea that the Romans did not know volcanos and had no word for it until 79 AD is rather ridiculous. The very word "volcano" goes back to the island of Vulcano, north of Sicily. The Romans thought it to be the entry to the workshop of the Roman god Vulcan. --87.187.139.50talk to me 17:13, August 26, 2012 (UTC)
Non-interference with history
Should this really be on this page as i don't see its relevence to this article. surely it would be better suited on its own article Dark Lord Xander 12:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
The TARDIS translation circuit and the puns
It is clear from Lucius' response that it did a better job of pun-rendering than in TV: The Web Planet. (I mean come on, Isop-tope?) Anyway, my guess is that the harmless/armless pun would be rendered "Sed non est bracchiatus" (bracchium meaning arm), a pun on "bracatus" (meaning foreign, barbarian, or effeminate, lit. "trousered"). And I assume that the sun/son pun would be rendered as a "sol/solus" (sun/alone) pun of some sort. "Every sun must set ... it will rise alone", perhaps? Any other thoughts? - Tawaki 05:37, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
Fixed point in time?
If the eruption is a fixed point in time, then how come the Doctor is able to save someone? So shouldn't "time" know that the Doctor will save someone from the destruction of Pompeii and therefore it has happened, and it was fixed that a group of people were saved.--81.98.0.33 16:49, December 31, 2009 (UTC)
The thing about changing time is that there is logical loopholes, ways to cheat and keep the timeline good, all you need is a bit of imagination.Besides, one family wouldn't have made a lot of difference, and it's been mentioned that in most cases the universe compensates for changes in the timeline. Excalibur-117 17:06, December 31, 2009 (UTC)
The Doctor's Coat
At some point the Doctor re-enters the TARDIS to stash his coat. 107.10.62.59talk to me 22:29, January 25, 2014 (UTC)
