You are exploring the Discontinuity Index, a place where any details or rumours about unreleased stories are forbidden.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.
This page is for discussing the ways in which The Ark doesn't fit well with other DWU narratives. You can also talk about the plot holes that render its own, internal narrative confusing.
Remember, this is a forum, so civil discussion is encouraged. However, please do not sign your posts. Also, keep all posts about the same continuity error under the same bullet point. You can add a new point by typing:
* This is point one. ::This is a counter-argument to point one. :::This is a counter-argument to the counter-argument above * This is point two. ::Explanation of point two. ::Further discussion and query of point two. ... and so on.
- It's rather remarkable that the TARDIS manages to land in the same spot twice (albeit a few years apart) when the Doctor can't control its journey.
- The Doctor forgot to enter new spacial coordinates, or there was a breakdown in the mechanism, and only the time circuits were activated for this journey. This being the case, the TARDIS followed its default/emergency procedure (See TV: Terminus) of remaining locked-on to the Ark as a 'fixed point', even though it would have moved billions of miles through space in the intervening centuries it took to reach Refusis.
- Actually the background changes so much that it is unlikely that the TARDIS landed in the exact same spot.
- The Doctor forgot to enter new spacial coordinates, or there was a breakdown in the mechanism, and only the time circuits were activated for this journey. This being the case, the TARDIS followed its default/emergency procedure (See TV: Terminus) of remaining locked-on to the Ark as a 'fixed point', even though it would have moved billions of miles through space in the intervening centuries it took to reach Refusis.
- Alternatively, given the recent revelations in The Doctor's Wife, the TARDIS may have realised that the Doctor was partially responsible for causing the Monoids to overthrow the guardians, and taken him to the future because that is where he "needed to go" to put things right.
- Even though I completely agree with this explaination (although for me, the TARDIS brought him there just because he needed to GO there, not precisely to help the guardians overthrow the Monoids but still to be involved in the events) I'd just like to point out than he DIDN'T landed on the exact same spot (well, not exactly.) Though he did landed around the same spot INSIDE the Ark, the ship was now "700 years of travel" away from its previous location from Part 1 & 2. In part 1 & 2, it was 700 years away fromi Refusis but in Part 3 & 4, it was like just one or two days away from the planet. (By the way, I know this isn't an argument AGAINST the previous point, but I didn't know where to put it. Also, English isn't my first language so I might have made some mistakes.)
- Alternatively, given the recent revelations in The Doctor's Wife, the TARDIS may have realised that the Doctor was partially responsible for causing the Monoids to overthrow the guardians, and taken him to the future because that is where he "needed to go" to put things right.
- First, The Doctor had no particular intention of returning to the ship, so that is somewhat irrelevant to the question. That said: (a) Is it remarkable? Yes. (b) Is it an amazing coincidence? Possibly (c) Unless it was part of some grander scheme/influence. (d) However, is it a discontinuity? Absolutely not.
- When the Commander and Zentos question Steven about the TARDIS in the Ark's Control Room in "The Steel Sky", why does the Commander ask "You travel in that black box?" — bearing in mind that the TARDIS is blue?
- Perhaps the scanner screen in the Control Room shows a monochrome picture?