Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Thin Ice

You are exploring the Discontinuity Index, a place where any details or rumours about unreleased stories are forbidden.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.

This page is for discussing the ways in which Thin Ice doesn't fit well with other DWU narratives. You can also talk about the plot holes that render its own, internal narrative confusing.

Remember, this is a forum, so civil discussion is encouraged. However, please do not sign your posts. Also, keep all posts about the same continuity error under the same bullet point. You can add a new point by typing:

* This is point one.
::This is a counter-argument to point one.
:::This is a counter-argument to the counter-argument above
* This is point two.
::Explanation of point two.
::Further discussion and query of point two.

... and so on. 

• Bill claims she has never seen a person die before, yet she was present when the Vardy killed one of the human settlers in the previous episode (a few hours ago in the show's continuity).

It probably happened too fast to really register with her as a death. Plus Spider was a child so it's understandable that she would she be particularly upset about it.

• How did the fish pass through London Bridge (which was the old bridge with narrow arches) without damaging it?

• It is stated that the waste from the creature (poop) is more efficient that coal. Sutcliffe decides to blow up the ice using the poop. But, coal is not an explosive!

• What has become of the fish since its appearance in 1814?