Talk:Human Nature (TV story)
I thought Family of blood was part 2 of the Human nature story!
Plot summary copied from English Wikipedia under GFDL
As English Wikipedia shares the same site license with TARDIS, I've copied a rather detailed account of the plot from there to here. Please edit to site standard or remove as appropriate.
The source information for this text can be obtained from the history of the article wikipedia:Human Nature (Doctor Who episode). The version copied is taken from this revision, with the timestamp 20:15, 27 May 2007, last edited by wikipedia:user:Gluben.
A much briefer and more compact version was substituted in the Wikipedia article by me, and this can be used here instead of the detailed version if desired. --Tony Sidaway 14:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
The Journal in Rose
This one sounds a bit unlikely and probably should have a source added to it. Can anyone confirm that the Journal of Impossible Things actually appears in Clive's possession in "Rose"? I doubt it since they probably had no idea they'd be adapting the novel at that early stage; perhaps it was just a notebook. Are there any sources - interviews, DW Confidential, magazine articles, DVD commentaries - to support this? If not, it probably should be removed as baseless speculation. 68.146.41.232 18:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
The novel
Does this episode make the Human Nature novel continuity? The evil dudeArnie 18:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Definitely not. There are a lot of differences, not the least of which is the fact that the novel involves the Seventh Doctor and Bernice Summerfield. -DrGaellon (talk | contribs) 10:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- One could argue that because they're significantly different in a number of regards, they could be separate adventures. It's a massively thorny issue though, and would require a very careful reading of the novel to establish them as wholly distinct adventures. Paul Cornell, for his part, wrote a bit of a tome on canon following the televised adventure, essentially to avoid having to directly answer which one was the more canonical. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 17:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- If it was, then the Doctor coincidentally encountered two Joan Redferns under similar circumstances. -- Noneofyourbusiness 00:11, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
- One could argue that because they're significantly different in a number of regards, they could be separate adventures. It's a massively thorny issue though, and would require a very careful reading of the novel to establish them as wholly distinct adventures. Paul Cornell, for his part, wrote a bit of a tome on canon following the televised adventure, essentially to avoid having to directly answer which one was the more canonical. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 17:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
