Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Dragonfire

Theory page
< Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes
Revision as of 12:41, 3 April 2010 by CzechOut (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{discontinuity}} *It's not exactly an "error", in the sense that the production team intended it, but the literal cliffhanger at the end of part one is a big, ol' cheat. At…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
You are exploring the Discontinuity Index, a place where any details or rumours about unreleased stories are forbidden.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.

This page is for discussing the ways in which Dragonfire doesn't fit well with other DWU narratives. You can also talk about the plot holes that render its own, internal narrative confusing.

Remember, this is a forum, so civil discussion is encouraged. However, please do not sign your posts. Also, keep all posts about the same continuity error under the same bullet point. You can add a new point by typing:

* This is point one.
::This is a counter-argument to point one.
:::This is a counter-argument to the counter-argument above
* This is point two.
::Explanation of point two.
::Further discussion and query of point two.

... and so on. 
  • It's not exactly an "error", in the sense that the production team intended it, but the literal cliffhanger at the end of part one is a big, ol' cheat. At the end of part one, the Doctor looks down an almost bottomless cliff of ice. But by the start of the next, the camera shifts to reveal that there's a handy little ledge, onto which Glitz is able to pull the Doctor.
  • It's unclear why the Doctor, went out on the ledge.
This occurred because an important scene was removed which would have justified it.
  • Why hide the Dragonfire on the part of the planet that Kane can get to?
  • Why does Kane kill his mercenaries, having gone to the trouble of collecting them?
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.