Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/State of Decay

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes
Revision as of 08:20, 27 April 2010 by Tangerineduel (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{discontinuity}} *The Doctor says the Tower decor is rococo when actually it's late Saxon/early Romanesque. *In the cliffhanger to part one there are hundreds if not thousands…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
You are exploring the Discontinuity Index, a place where any details or rumours about unreleased stories are forbidden.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.

This page is for discussing the ways in which State of Decay doesn't fit well with other DWU narratives. You can also talk about the plot holes that render its own, internal narrative confusing.

Remember, this is a forum, so civil discussion is encouraged. However, please do not sign your posts. Also, keep all posts about the same continuity error under the same bullet point. You can add a new point by typing:

* This is point one.
::This is a counter-argument to point one.
:::This is a counter-argument to the counter-argument above
* This is point two.
::Explanation of point two.
::Further discussion and query of point two.

... and so on. 
  • The Doctor says the Tower decor is rococo when actually it's late Saxon/early Romanesque.
  • In the cliffhanger to part one there are hundreds if not thousands of bats - who seem to conveniently disappear before the reprise in episode 2.