Talk:White Supreme Dalek

Name / Delete?

. This creature already covered at Dalek Supreme#Dalek Revival, and in a way I think that's better. It is just the latest of the Dalek Supremes. Calling it "White Supreme Dalek" I think introduces conjecture, because "white" isn't a part of its onscreen name; that's just description based on visual inspection. I think this article should either be deleted, or renamed Supreme Dalek (Victory of the Daleks), and then the info at Dalek Supreme should be moved here. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 14:04, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

Agreed, and I made the flipping page!

If you agree, why'd you remove the delete and conjecture tags? Please don't remove tags like that without consensus. The point of the tags is to encourage discussion here, and they can't just be removed unilaterally by you. They'll get removed when the matters they flag are revolved. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 16:00, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

Look, if we all agree that's fine. It's settled. Lets create that page! Batmanboy 18:06, April 20, 2010 (UTC) 19:06 20th April 2010

This page is useless. We already have this information on the page it should be on - Dalek Supreme. Not once before has someone found a need to make pages for individual Supremes. The Brig 17:34, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

I agree. The only reason I initially wavered slightly was because I thought maybe there was some cause to call him "Supreme Dalek" instead of "Dalek Supreme", but the script doesn't actually support that. Dalek Supreme wins. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 06:41, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

OK. The page has more information than that tiny little section in Dalek Supreme so we should expand the section. If we expand it then it follows the rules of the wiki. user:Darkraider09 22:29, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

I have once again re-instated the delete and conjecture tags on this page. Again, these tags cannot be removed unilaterally while a discussion is under way. There is absolutely no in-universe basis for the name of this article. At no point in the script is this creature called "White Supreme Dalek". That alone is reason to delete the page. This info should go into the Dalek Supreme page. This is just the latest in a long line of Dalek Supremes, in just the same way as there are multiple Cyber-Leaders, Cyber-Controllers, etc. Expanding an article does not in and of itself make an article valid. There must be cause to believe that this is more than the latest version of the Dalek Supreme in order to have its own article. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 05:21, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

I'm ready to hit delete on this article, the Supreme Dalek article appears to have all the relevant information pertaining to this latest incarnation of the ruling elite of Dalek. --Tangerineduel 16:29, May 7, 2010 (UTC)