More actions
Question
This has only just occurred to me, but what do we name categories for non-narrative source pages without summaries? They don't lack a plot summary, just a summary of their contents, so perhaps something like Category:Features without summaries? Also, I feel the "hub category", to take into account of non-narratives, should be titled Category:Missing summaries; although all the subcats for television stories, comics, audios, etc, should remain at the proposed Category:TV stories without plot summaries. Sorry for not realising this before the closure of the thread!
14:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, your suggestion seems reasonable. Category:Missing plot summaries should be a redirect to Category:Missing summaries, though. Bongo50 ☎ 14:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- I don't agree, the point for that naming convention to distinguish between publisher summary and plot summary. You're collapsing two categories into one. We could have Category:Missing summaries (as our new Category:Missing plot summaries) and also Category:Missing publisher summaries, that would work. Or Category:Missing summaries and Category:Missing plot. Najawin ☎ 18:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- What about the following:
- Category:Missing summaries
- Category:Missing plot summaries
- Subcategories for different mediums and series
- Category:Missing publisher summaries
- Subcategories for different mediums and series
- Category:Missing feature summaries
- Subcategories for different mediums and series
- Category:Missing plot summaries
- Category:Missing summaries
- Bongo50 ☎ 12:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- What about the following:
- I don't see why we'd have to do that. Surely, a feature page could be in both Category:Missing feature summaries and Category:Missing publisher summaries? However, I do feel that it might be worth considering whether we need Category:Missing publisher summaries. Generally, publisher summaries are reliably filled in during page creation as a standard. Thoughts? Bongo50 ☎ 19:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)