User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Help!/@comment-15755849-20131229214328/@comment-188432-20131230014605

You misread me. I never said there were no formal policies. You had asked whether there was a formal review process for admins — or, as your thread title put it, "Who admins the admins"? That was what I said had no formal process. I never suggested the wiki had no rules. Shambala108's comments are perfectly in line with mine, since we aren't really talking about the same thing. She's talking about rules on the wiki in general, and I was answering your specific question about internal audits of administrators.

I don't know where you've gotten the idea that there is some sort of "problem" with the wiki that needs to be addressed. We're perfectly "up to code". There's no issue that needs to be addressed.

You seem to have a grievance that your own edits have been mishandled. I'll take a look at that and respond on your own talk page. But please stop suggesting that because your work got reverted there's a general problem with the way the wiki has been administered. When you submit your work to our wiki, you agree that it can be edited, refactored, or removed without your permission. So when your work gets changed, you simply accept it as part of the deal. You don't go starting threads that suggests that there's something wrong with the wiki's management.

Finally, I am not the wiki's founder. Please read Tardis:About.