Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170416224359

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252
Revision as of 13:10, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170416224359

The Pilot
FftF

That may seem more logical to you, but it's not the quote that we actually have. We clearly have Moffat discussing the fact that FFtF did happen and that the episode was designed for it to be there.

I don't really recall the set being heavily inconsistent either. In fact, it kinda looks exactly like the set that we later see the "Dalek" in.

I respect your opinion in that you have the right to have it, but I don't think it really has that much bearing. So far, the best evidence we have against it being valid is that the dialogue almost kinda doesn't match up if you look at it sideways. Either way, how well you think it fits has nothing to do with if it was meant to fit. Moffat wrote it to "fit," so as far as this site needs to be concerned it fits.

I too can see where SOTO would come to his conclusion, but more importantly I can see how he's mistaken.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.