User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20170915033630/@comment-4028641-20181207044830

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-1432718-20170915033630
Revision as of 13:27, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

"The main purpose of an advertisement is to highlight something out-of-universe rather than to tell a story (even if a story is present)."

As a fan of the TV series The Transformers, I find this definition questionable at best. That show was made entirely to sell a toyline to kids. The episodes were structured to show toys, the characters were created to match the toys, and thee episodes are structured to get kids to want the toys for playtime. If you were to tell me "none of the Transformers TV show episodes (nor the movie) are stories," then I would respond "balderdash!" I have never heard someone say that a storytelling narrative being a story or not can be defined by the intention. Never never never.