User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-45692830-20200709010636

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-1432718-20200505204802
Revision as of 13:30, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

One letter can make a lot of difference in a word. That will be my only comment on that issue.

As for the Cornell issue. "Real story" as opposed to just a short 4 panel comic or something vacuous and silly. Like something with meat in it. Your proposed example basically removes all of the meaning in mine and reduces it to, well, fanfic. So it's a blatant example of question begging. I proposed an example of what "officially propositioned" would look like in order to meet your qualifications, and you said "that's not realistic", and your proposed realistic solution is one that basically grants you your entire argument.... What?