User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20190903191921/@comment-28743561-20190903232246

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-1678571-20190903191921
Revision as of 13:37, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I'll add my support for this being a valid story. To elaborate rule 4, which says "If a story was intended to be set outside the DWU..." This story is very much inteneded to be in the DWU:

  1. Ace (and Sophie Aldred) has aged in the 30 years since she met the Doctor.
  2. Ace reminisces on her time with the Doctor. (i.e. Building on valid stories means this is intened to be valid.)
  3. It builds on Ace working at A Charitable Earth mentioned in TV: Death of the Doctor and AUDIO: In Remembrance. As a nice bonus, this story being valid would give this wiki nice bits of extra context on post-Survival Ace.
  4. For a story like this that isn't intended to be in the DWU, see "The Sixth Doctor is on trial AGAIN!" which promoted the Season 23 Collection.

And while an unrealesed story is not proper evidence, an upcoming Big Finish story will probably be mentioned at some point, so I might as well cover that base here and now. (Although spoiler rules might limit any more discusion on it.)

This all being said, should we expand this debate to discuss Jo Grant Returns as well? It is a very similar webcast and any precedent should/would be apply to both of them.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-1678571-20190903191921/@comment-28743561-20190903232246&oldid=3501324"