User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-6032121-20191014105336
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-6032121-20191014105336 True, I did say that Borisashton's point "stood", though I wouldn't describe that as agreeing enthusiastically. I just thought it was a valid point yet to be answered, not a be-all-end-all. I can, at any rate, perfectly see where the confusion came from and certainly bear you no ill will for it. It's a random mistake of the sort that one is bound to make with long and twisty debates like this one.
That being said, and regardless of the status of Borisashton's statement regarding your "misrepresentation" of the dialogue thus far (which it will be up to another administrator to decide), back to the topic at hand:
Speaking of valid points yet to be answered and of points that stand, though, Amorkuz, I still would like you to tell us what exactly your argument is in bringing up all that "are the works self-published?" business. If you're not angling for a "it's self-published on the Internet so it's fanfic" argument, to what policy is the self-published nature of the work relevant?
