User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-31010985-20191210030907

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-31010985-20191101112654
Revision as of 13:43, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-31010985-20191210030907 Absolutely agree in regard to wiki creep. We don't want to be covering stuff not related to the DWU but in this case, as you say, the writer and the publisher have stated that their series as a whole should not be covered and have clarified which stories are crossovers.

At the end of the day, if we don't cover a story featuring the Doctor's daughter what can we cover? Most of Bernice Summerfield, Iris Wildthyme, Graceless, anything from Reeltime or BBV, and many others probably wouldn't even make the cut. Non-BBC stuff like K9 would certainly be in peril.

As alluded to earlier, closing this thread because the stories don't pass rule four is a much more dangerous precedent than if they passed.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-31010985-20191210030907&oldid=3501664"