User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-6032121-20200110235218

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-6032121-20200110235218 @User:Amorkuz: Please see my post above. You may disagree with your fellow administrator on whether posting kudos on a thread constitutes participating in this thread. But since, as I argued fairly thoroughly, thinking kudos don't count as "participating" is a perfectly understandable position to hold, could you maybe lay off terms like "deceit" when talking about said fellow admin, when it's likely all a matter of intellectual disagreement/misunderstanding?

Please also see User:Shambala108's extremly clear statement that this thread is not exempt from T:SPOIL.

As for User:Revanvolatrelundar then deleting the offending kudos, I think it's fairly clear, given their statements, that this is not an attempt to make a liar out of you, but simply to comply with FANDOM's wishes — as well as your apparent ones: if the potential influence of the kudos on this thread would be to give undue feelings of there being a consensus to the eventual closing administrator, surely removing the kudos before that admin reads through the thread solves that problem?

(Note that Revan says "thanks to Nate for fighting my corner", thus endorsing everything NateBumber said in his reply to the question originally asked to Revan himself.)