User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-33695797-20200703215633/@comment-6032121-20200703232425
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-33695797-20200703215633/@comment-6032121-20200703232425 Thank you! That gives me a clearer picture of the facts. Sadly, they are very fiddly facts. Is there any original narrative information in this thing? Because what gives me pause is that all the "case studies" are, you say, accounts of the plots of TV episodes (albeit in-universe). That smacks of the reference work with a thin in-universe veneer, more than of the experimental novel.
But what gives me some hope for the validity of this thing is the following note on the page:
The section detailing other TARDISes shows contains an illustration of the design Missy used for the interior of her TARDIS, which was never seen on screen.
If it contains significant amounts of wholly new information not seen in any previous stories, then the argument that Richard Atkinson & Mike Tucker were actually telling a story is much stronger. But if it's just a neat way of presenting a lot of TV summaries, I'm not so sure about this.
