User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-188432-20130512034722

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359
Revision as of 13:45, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-188432-20130512034722 I'm still not gettin' it. If the actions of three people are given over to one person, as is the apparent case with Birthright, how can the novelisation policy possibly cover this? The novelisation policy is essentially for minor differences. This is a question of wholly different people being assigned the same actions.

I really do think we need to say that if you remove the Doctor and/or companions from a derivative work, then that derivative is wholly invalid. It's just changing too much of the story to lose major characters like that.

I mean, fine, if you really wanna keep the story pages for these two audios, we can. But I think we should definitely slap them with {{notdwu}}.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-188432-20130512034722&oldid=3501812"