User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170416234242

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252
Revision as of 13:50, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

You did a great job researching there, this is obviously something that's hard to piece together.

I agree that the writer's word isn't always law, but at the same time it shouldn't be used in an inclusion debate to decide if the story is valid or not. There are many stories by Terrance Dicks that contradict everything that he's ever written, for instance. Mostly his novels.

We should note these discrepancies on the page, and perhaps in some cases on the character pages (bts?) but otherwise I don't think you can all those problems anything but production errors.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170416234242&oldid=3502089"