User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170224224528

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 13:55, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170224224528 Baker's End is especially a contrived example because Vince Cosmos isn't nearly as relevant to people as the Daleks.

Alright, so to your theoretical example -- would an episode of a cartoon be valid if they featured a licensed crossover that explicitly explained the differences between the two universes and made it clear that the two universes were different?

Pretty much yea. If they were to go that far out of their way to explain why the Daleks are outside of the DWU, then the story is meant to tie-into the DWU.

"Well it's stupid" is not a reasonable explanation of making something invalid.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170224224528&oldid=3502352"