User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200707131140/@comment-39988495-20200707134559
More actions
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200707131140/@comment-39988495-20200707134559 Understandable, but I believe an admin said it was easier to rule out charity publications altogether than go through them on a case by case basis, determining the legality of the stories. If you could provide evidence that Lance Parkin (and Paul Magrs in the case of the Iris Wildthyme story) and Kate Orman still have the rights to these stories, then technically they can be accepted as a valid source.