User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-45692830-20200511001712

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-45692830-20200510214412
Revision as of 14:07, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-45692830-20200511001712 Again. I'm in favor of validity. I'm simply attempting to explain the argument against as best I understand it. If somebody else were to want to chime in against validity I would appreciate it.

That said, perhaps the related discussion of "should we create a page for this website from an in universe perspective" is illuminating to the discussion. Doing so could (but does not necessarily) open up a can of worms, such as if other stories reference it and talk about articles being on it us sort of having to create an entire "meta wiki". (As unlikely as this is.)

Perhaps, if I'm again going to be playing devil's advocate here, this is where we draw the line, at stories that reference the wiki itself. Or even if we don't draw the line here, perhaps we should have a policy in place concerning how we handle this issue. And since it is the first time we've seen it, why not discuss that issue here?