User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-6032121-20200723191440
More actions
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-6032121-20200723191440 (For the record, I replied to the similar message that User:DiSoRiEnTeD1 left at Thread:275671. We were talking at cross-purposes because I believe the "more relevant thread" on which all this should more properly be discussed is not Thread:275671, but rather Thread:273268, which is locked for technical reasons. I mean, it seems to me like the thread about how to define Lockdown! is the more directly relevant one, rather than the thread about whether to take Harness's arguably-outrageous novelisation claims at face value in the matter of naming one specific page…)