User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170223123902
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170223123902
OttselSpy25 wrote: Eh these days I tend to sway between sides.
I would love to call DiT valid, I think the copyright argument is just poorly set-up, and I'm sure we could find quotes to change the tides. But at the same time, I wouldn't know how to explain the story. It's super badly written.
It's just hard for me to get super invested in a thread that I don't expect to be left open for very long.
Additionally if this thread was to be closed now, it would be in no-one's best interest as this debate hasn't properly played out. An admin closing it now would go against everything these threads are for.
