Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5791028-20150709160234/@comment-4028641-20151008210651

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-5791028-20150709160234
Revision as of 14:18, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5791028-20150709160234/@comment-4028641-20151008210651

Danniesen wrote: Should we take it up for consideration on how long an article can be? Creating one single article would certainly save us time from creating multiple articles, which we do not strive to do either.

I suppose it should be brought into consideration how we write the behind-the-scenes and the invalid pages if we make them. There are two kinds -- where we write it from an out-of-universe perspective about the story's character (ex. Gareth Jenkins, Ozmo) or if we write it as if were a valid article but put the invalid tag on and explain why it is invalid in the "behind the scenes" section (ex. The Valeyard (He Jests at Scars...), Ninth Doctor (Scream of the Shalka), and most invalid character articles)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.