User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20190216032054/@comment-28743561-20190607162718

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-28743561-20190216032054
Revision as of 14:22, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Some have argued that the vulture is essentially a background prop made of flesh and blood, but I personally see no reason to say that sentient DWU characters should be more valid then non-sentient DWU characters.

If this story concerned a non-sentient alien (or even a robot) that originated in a DWU story, I would expect much more support. So I see no reason to descriminate based the sentience of the characters.

And the name drop of the Doctor should not go overlooked. Both peices of evidence provide a good case for validity in my book.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-28743561-20190216032054/@comment-28743561-20190607162718&oldid=3504027"