Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-6032121-20190121193310/@comment-5918438-20190121201427

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-6032121-20190121193310
Revision as of 14:23, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-6032121-20190121193310/@comment-5918438-20190121201427 It would be nice to hear (in the near future) from someone who’s actually been to one of these. Failing that, a little more research would do us good.

I don’t think there’s a question about validity: we didn’t even let Attack of the Graske in, which of course would have been far simpler, with more limited choices. Barring a surprise statement about canonicity, like we got with the Adventure Games, I don't see how this could pass T:VALID. Unless there's a complete story independent of the participants' actions.

The real discussion here is how to cover this thing. And at least speaking for myself, I feel I'm lacking some information. The trailer shows some of the video elements. How do they slot into the live experience? I might just be clueless on this as I've never been to an escape room.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.