User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-38288735-20191115183354

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-28743561-20191009174707
Revision as of 14:25, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Yeah, that all makes sense to me. For the record, I would draw the line pretty much right after this page. While I would theoretically support separate pages for animations (based on having a separate "crew" from the original) if they were all complete stories, the fact that some of them are partial animations (due to only some of the episodes being missing) is the deciding factor for me. I don't feel the need for separate pages for partial stories. It's a pretty thin line, but that's where I'd draw it.

So, back on-topic, does anyone have any new arguments that have not been previously stated?

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-38288735-20191115183354&oldid=3504203"