User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-4028641-20191103134250

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-28743561-20191009174707
Revision as of 14:26, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Fair, fair.

Personally, I've always felt is was best to cover animated/reconstructed stories on separate pages from the originals. But this has no precedent, so I think it's fine to expand the original to reference this as a reconstructed version. To me, it certainly seems like this was made because of how unlikely an animated version is, so it's basically the same category of content.